Getting a divorce is a life changing event for all parties involved. Unlike other types of legal proceedings, divorce cases at times involve raw emotion, anger, betrayal, and even denial. Such emotions often lead individuals into taking actions that not only hurt their divorce case from a legal standpoint, but also exacerbate the overall emotional trauma for both sides.
Mediation, Arbitration, and Alternatives to Litigation
Mediation, arbitration, and alternative dispute resolution are the newest trend in the area of family law and represent the future as it relates to the resolution of family law matters.
In mediation, the parties meet with an impartial mediator who does not formally represent either of the parties. The mediator works with the parties in an effort to reach a mutually agreeable resolution of all outstanding issues. Mediation typically costs less than litigation and generally produces an agreement which tends to have a more long-lasting effect. The reason for this is that the agreement is the product of the mutual agreement of the parties. Mediation also tends to reduce the amount of stress and anxiety normally associated with the litigation process. The final agreement reached by the parties in the mediation then forms the basis for the final divorce, dissolution, or separation agreement of the parties.
Arbitration is another form of alternate dispute resolution. Rather than the parties seeking recourse in the courts, the parties may agree to binding arbitration of any issues in dispute. The matter is then presented to an arbitrator who renders a binding decision. The parties are compelled to abide by the decision of the arbitrator. Much like mediation, the cost of arbitration tends to be less than that of litigation. Arbitration is different from mediation in that the arbitrator renders a decision which is imposed upon the parties. In mediation, the parties reach the ultimate agreement themselves and the agreement is then incorporated into a binding document.
Many Courts in New Jersey are now requiring parties to attend mandatory mediation sessions incident to litigation. For example, the parties may be referred to custody and parenting time mediation prior to those issues being brought before a Court for a decision. In addition, many Courts in New Jersey are now requiring the parties to attend mandatory economic mediation as part of the litigation process. Jessica N. Mazur, Esq. has been appointed to the Court Approved Economic Mediator Roster by the New Jersey Courts. Mediation is being incorporated into the litigation process to aid the parties in reaching a mutual agreement on outstanding issues without having to incur unnecessary cost and the emotional stress incurred in a litigation setting.
The Family Law attorneys at Hoagland Longo are experienced in all facets of alternative dispute resolution. They have successfully mediated and arbitrated many cases with successful results. We encourage you to contact our Family Law attorneys to discuss these alternatives to litigation to ascertain if one of these forms of alternative dispute resolution is appropriate for resolution of your case.
For Mediation and Arbitration Services:
- Jessica N. Mazur and Brian McFadden-DiNicola: New Brunswick Office - 732-545-4717
- Jessica N. Mazur: Red Bank Office - 732-545-4717
Related Blog posts
Divorce and Taxes: How the new tax bill will impact alimony, child support, and prenuptial agreements in New Jersey
It’s no secret that most of the divorce complaints in New Jersey are resolved via settlement. However, the tax bill which was recently passed and signed by the President is poised to shake the foundations of the practice. In this blog, Andrea Mackaronis shares what couples, separated and divorced, need to know before the new tax bill kicks in.
In Case You Missed It – NJ Superior Court Tackles Transgender Child’s Name Change in a Case of First Impression
In the recent matter of Sacklow v. Betts, the New Jersey Supreme Court was presented with Ms. Sacklow's application to change the name of her transgender child. The matter was decided on March 17, 2017, when the Court found the name change would be in the child’s best interests. In this blog, Andrea Mackaronis breaks down the list of factors that were created and considered by the Court in the decision that will pave the future of transgender youth in New Jersey.