Unfortunately, in today’s practice, lawyers must constantly be concerned about the potential for a malpractice claim. Not only are such claims personal to attorneys, but they can have significant repercussions on law firms, both financially and reputationally. We believe the best way to avoid a legal malpractice claim is to manage risks associated with the practice of law. That is why we offer a wide range of services to attorneys and their firms on such matters as agreements between partners or owners, engagement letters and client contracts, ethics advice and training, file management and conflict systems, office sharing agreements and professional liability policies and coverage issues.

Despite best efforts, even the most careful, knowledgeable, and reputable attorney may experience a malpractice claim at some point during the course of his or her career. That is when our years of experience in representing attorneys and their professional liability insurers in such claims proves to be invaluable. Whether it is a pre-claim matter, or a suit pending in state or federal court, we have the skill to thoroughly analyze the liability and damages aspect of the claim and evaluate the best approach for resolving the dispute quickly and cost-effectively. Furthermore, we have expertise in handling the so called "case within a case" aspect of legal malpractice claims. Whether the underlying claim involves a personal injury suit, a real estate or business transaction, an estate or trust issue, or a tax matter, we have the requisite knowledge and experience to aggressively and effectively defend the claim.

Appreciating that our clients in these cases are sophisticated and knowledgeable, we welcome their input in not only devising a resolution plan that meets their goals, but in implementing it as well. Recognizing that some claims are frivolous, while others have merit, our clients respect the candor with which we evaluate and report on the claim. When appropriate, we focus on resolving cases early through motion practice, mediation, and other forms of alternative dispute resolution. However, some cases just need to be tried. We have the reputation of being zealous advocates for our clients in the courtroom, with the ability to simplify even the most complex cases, thereby enabling the jurors to understand them, and return the appropriate verdict.

Related Blog posts

N.J. Supreme Court Declines to Reconsider Ethics Opinion Banning Lawyers from Online Legal Service Plans

The New Jersey Supreme Court recently declined to review a formal ethics opinion related to attorney participation in online legal services. Specifically, a group of three New Jersey State Bar committees said attorneys licensed in New Jersey may not be involved with “non-lawyer, corporately owned services that offer legal services to the public.” A group called Consumers for a Responsive Legal System asked the Supreme Court to reverse this opinion, but the justices denied the petition.

The Resistance Against Avvo's Client-Linking Services Spreads to New Jersey

New Jersey joins a number of States in banning attorneys’ participation in Avvo’s programs which require attorneys to pay “marketing fees.” In this blog, Joseph V. Leone examines the Joint Opinion issued by New Jersey Supreme Court prohibiting New Jersey attorneys from participating in the Avvo client-linking legal service.

AVVO’s “Fixed Fee Limited Scope” Platform Presents Ethical Violations

AVVO, a for-profit website which connects clients with attorneys, has been under scrutiny by state bar associations’ ethics boards for a service they provide – “Fixed Fee Limited Scope (FFLS)” – that allows clients to obtain “limited scope” legal representation at a fixed-fee set by AVVO. The platform raises some serious issues, but the primary ethical concern surrounds fee-sharing with non-lawyers. The prohibition against such agreements has been a constant in the legal world, but in an ever